Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour


Submitted on
March 31, 2008
Image Size
285 KB


1,069 (1 today)
23 (who?)

Camera Data

PENTAX Corporation
PENTAX Optio E30
Shutter Speed
1/10 second
Focal Length
6 mm
ISO Speed
Date Taken
Apr 7, 2033, 11:25:53 PM


Creative Commons License
Some rights reserved. This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 License.
Tough in White ::Stock 8:: by spiked-stock Tough in White ::Stock 8:: by spiked-stock
This is the series for ~albonia, whose work you should totally check out ;) The idea through this is...wrestler. xD

Download for full-size!!

(c) spiked-stock

* Link back to me in the description of your piece.

* Do not just add a filter/change a color or something along those lines. One must easily be able to distinguish a difference.

* Do not submit your edits to "Photography". You didn't press the button, so you can't say its yours. :)

* Send me a note or comment with a link to the image in which you used my stock.

* Do not use my images for commercial purposes without my written permission. Just ask! I promise I won't bite :D

* Do not use my stock off Deviant Art without my written permission :) I officially give my permission for these stock images to be used in or for school projects, artwork, or otherwise for educational purposes.

* Do not use my stock in anything offensive, MAINLY animal cruelty.
Add a Comment:
lerosenoir Featured By Owner Oct 28, 2008
Pictures throughout the whole series are blurry! These pictures could have been SO useful too. :(
spiked-stock Featured By Owner Oct 28, 2008   Photographer
I'm sorry. My camera sucks, and I don't have money for a new one. Though I'd rather you have said nothing at all than made me feel like crap about all of it >.<
lerosenoir Featured By Owner Oct 30, 2008
I'm just telling you what the truth is.

I'm a student of Graphic Design, so I know that for stock photography to be useful, it MUST be clear and of a decently large size.

And I didn't say anything rude. I was just telling you that they could have been useful, if they weren't blurry. I didn't know if the camera was at fault, or if it was accidental blurriness. I was just bringing your attention to the matter.
spiked-stock Featured By Owner Oct 30, 2008   Photographer
wellp, thank you. But I do this for free, for no other reason than some people do find it useful. -shrug- There happen to be a ton of people who use it purely for anatomical reference, which is freakin' awesome. But they are not manipping photos, so this works for them. If I got money for what I did, ya damned straight it would be perfect and clear and much better lit. Unfortunately, I don't get paid, so I do it for free and for fun. It's not so fun to be told what I've spent so much time on is useless though. >.>
lerosenoir Featured By Owner Oct 30, 2008
Again, only a couple were blurry. Thus, it was most likely accidental. And only a couple out of the whole lot you've done, does NOT add up to a great amount of time. But seriously, you should know this as you are old enough to know, That is life! You will be criticized. But don't think of what I said as criticism. I meant it to be helpful, so that you could keep in mind what is more useful.

Plus, clear photos do make better anatomical references. Just sayin'. I do have a traditional art background, I would know.
lerosenoir Featured By Owner Oct 30, 2008
Also, I forgot to mention, some of the photos in this series ARE NOT blurry. And that's why I wanted to bring it to your attention. A lot of them are of a decent quality. So, it was just strange to see good quality and then poor quality, all of the sudden.
Add a Comment: